Showing posts with label zfs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label zfs. Show all posts

Sunday, April 26, 2015

Limiting the size of a ZFS filesystem

And here is another quickie:

So, you created a zfs filesystem and realized you forgot to size it, or at least limit how much space in the pool it can use:

# df -h
[...]
storagepool/hosts/scan
                        67G    20K    63G     1%    /export/hosts/scan
storagepool/hosts/scan/local
                        67G    18K    63G     1%    /export/hosts/scan/local
#

Fear not for we have a way around it. Doesn't it look like we want to put a quota on that filesystem? If so, why not use the quota option in the zfs set command?

# zfs set quota=4G storagepool/hosts/scan
# df -h
[...]
storagepool/hosts/scan
                       4.0G    20K   4.0G     1%    /export/hosts/scan
storagepool/hosts/scan/local
                       4.0G    18K   4.0G     1%    /export/hosts/scan/local
#

Note that storagepool/hosts/scan/local, which is inside storagepool/hosts/scan, was also resized.

References

Setting Quotas on ZFS File Systems

Sunday, February 01, 2015

Entrypoint scripts and data persistency: mounting a NFS fileshare inside a docker container

This is a quick article; you have been warned.

The traditional way to have persistent data in a docker container is to feed it with a volume from the docker host. You begin by locating a directory, be it in the local docker host drive, network mounted to the docker host, or a volume in another docker container. Then feed it to the container using the VOLUME statement defined in the Dockerfile or to command line. We all know that. But what some (very few we hope) of you might not have been aware of is the volume is only mounted/attached to the container when you tell docker to run the container, which might make running/configuring something that require files in those volumes a bit challenging.

At this point I would expect one of you to shout "Aha! But you can then use an entrypoint script to do all that monkeying that needs to happen after volume is mounted and before whatever service this container provides starts!" And you would be quite right! Here's a quick example in case we lost somebody: if our Dockerfile ended up like this:

# Put the entrypoint script somewhere we can find
COPY docker-entrypoint.sh /entrypoint.sh
ENTRYPOINT ["/entrypoint.sh"]

EXPOSE 22
# Start service
CMD ["/usr/sbin/sshd", "-D"]

we would have created a file called entrypoint.sh in the root path of the container, which is run just after the volume is created and before the, in this example, sshd service is started. Said entrypoint file could do, I don't know:

#!/bin/sh
set -e

# Do something in /home, which is the mounted volume
/do-something-at-home.sh

# And we  are done here
exec "$@"

point is that do-something-at-home.sh is called only after the persistent volume is mounted into the container.

What if you want to mount a network fileshare straight into the container? Before I have time to answer that, someone from the audience will jump and state "Why would you want to do that? You can mount the network fileshare in the docker host and then use VOLUME just like Wicked Witch of the West intended!" What if I don't want to do that? What if I can't for whatever reason mount a network fileshare on the docker host?

The answer is that it is completely doable; you just have to ask the entrypoint script to do the mounting for you. To show what I mean I will use the example of mounting a NFSv4 fileshare that is supposed to be used by some website. So we modify our little entrypoint script a bit

#!/bin/sh
set -e

# /export/www was created in the Dockerfile
mount.nfs4 fileserver.example.com:/export/www /www/some-website 

# And we are done here
exec "$@"

Since we are using NFSv4, chances are you might need to add something like

RUN sed -i -e '/^#Domain/a Domain = example.com' /etc/idmapd.conf

to your dockerfile in addition to telling it to get the nfs client packages, but the general idea should apply for, say, SMB or ZFS or whatever other network filesystem that you fancy: let your entrypoint script do the heavy lifting!

Friday, April 24, 2009

ZFSing around (or, using ZFS under Solaris)

ZFS is a different file system than the old UFS. Best way to describe it is to think on it as a file system with LVM built on it. If you know LVM, you will understand what I am trying to say and recognize a lot of things here. If not, I promise that soon I will try to talk about it and compare ZFS, Linux LVM, and AIX LVM. For now, accept my simplistic explanation:

Logical Volume Manager, or LVM, is a way the separate the physical storage (think hard drives and networks drives and such things) from the storage seen by the user. In other words, what the users see is a pseudo disk (or logical volume if we are to use its terminology) of sorts which can be made of a collection of other disks, raid arrays, or just partitions of those disks. Now, while Linux LVM provides the logical disk which is then formatted and partitioned as they were normal disks, in ZFS these two steps are done become just one.

I think this will make sense using an example: in this Solaris 10 machine, we have two 73GB SCA hard drives. One of which, c0t0d0 (yes, Sun likes to call their drives differently than everybody else. We will talk about that in some other episode. For now, it suffices to say that d0 is the SCSI disk with SCSI ID 0), was formated as ZFS during the installation of the operating system and currently looks like this:

# df -h
Filesystem             size   used  avail capacity  Mounted on
boot/ROOT/root          67G   6.8G    40G    15%    /
/devices                 0K     0K     0K     0%    /devices
ctfs                     0K     0K     0K     0%    /system/contract
proc                     0K     0K     0K     0%    /proc
mnttab                   0K     0K     0K     0%    /etc/mnttab
swap                   1.9G   1.4M   1.9G     1%    /etc/svc/volatile
objfs                    0K     0K     0K     0%    /system/object
sharefs                  0K     0K     0K     0%    /etc/dfs/sharetab
fd                       0K     0K     0K     0%    /dev/fd
boot/ROOT/root/var      67G   727M    40G     2%    /var
swap                   1.9G    32K   1.9G     1%    /tmp
swap                   1.9G    40K   1.9G     1%    /var/run
boot                    67G   176K    40G     1%    /boot
boot/export             67G    20K    40G     1%    /export
boot/export/home        67G    15G    40G    28%    /export/home
# 

Then we have c0t1d0, also a 73GB HD that we plan to add to the hard drive. For this machine, I would like to have the following layout:

/
/var
/tmp
/export/home   (accounts)
/export/hosts  (virtual hosts, in case we have them)
/export/images (as this may end up being a netboot/jumpstart server)

Each of those would reside in a separate partition. Some of that has already been taken care of by Solaris' default install, but we are left with /export/hosts and /export, which will be run off c0t1d0. Before ZFS, we would divide the hard drive using format into two partitions and would edit /etc/vfstab to mount the two partitions at boot time:

# cat /etc/vfstab                      
#device         device          mount           FS      fsck    mount   mount
#to mount       to fsck         point           type    pass    at boot options
#
fd      -       /dev/fd fd      -       no      -
/proc   -       /proc   proc    -       no      -
/dev/zvol/dsk/boot/swap -       -       swap    -       no      -
/devices        -       /devices        devfs   -       no      -
sharefs -       /etc/dfs/sharetab       sharefs -       no      -
ctfs    -       /system/contract        ctfs    -       no      -
objfs   -       /system/object  objfs   -       no      -
swap    -       /tmp    tmpfs   -       yes     -
/dev/dsk/c0t1d0s4     /dev/rdsk/c0t1d0s4      /export/hosts        ufs     2       yes     -
/dev/dsk/c0t1d0s6     /dev/rdsk/c0t1d0s6      /export/images       ufs     2       yes     -
# 

but, in ZFS things are a bit different. First we need to create the pseudo disk mentioned above. In ZFS terminology that is called a pool; I guess they want to remind us that you usually create it by adding disks to it. So we create the pool, which shall be named storagepool. By now you may have realized that boot is the name of the pool created during the installation of the operating system.

# zpool create  storagepool c0t1d0
# df -h
Filesystem             size   used  avail capacity  Mounted on
boot/ROOT/root          67G   6.8G    40G    15%    /
/devices                 0K     0K     0K     0%    /devices
ctfs                     0K     0K     0K     0%    /system/contract
proc                     0K     0K     0K     0%    /proc
mnttab                   0K     0K     0K     0%    /etc/mnttab
swap                   1.9G   1.4M   1.9G     1%    /etc/svc/volatile
objfs                    0K     0K     0K     0%    /system/object
sharefs                  0K     0K     0K     0%    /etc/dfs/sharetab
fd                       0K     0K     0K     0%    /dev/fd
boot/ROOT/root/var      67G   727M    40G     2%    /var
swap                   1.9G    32K   1.9G     1%    /tmp
swap                   1.9G    40K   1.9G     1%    /var/run
boot                    67G   176K    40G     1%    /boot
boot/export             67G    20K    40G     1%    /export
boot/export/home        67G    15G    40G    28%    /export/home
storagepool             67G    19K    67G     1%    /storagepool
#

You may have noticed that the pool we created, storagepool is also a filesystem: as soon as we created the pool, it becomes a filesystem mounted under /storagepool. That is different than what is done under Linux LVM, where you would first create the pool, then partition and format that pool into the partitions you are going to use, and then mount them using /etc/fstab (the Linux equivalent to /etc/vfstab and mount -a. In Solaris and ZFS, on the other hand, that is done with just one command. I mean, we did not even have to edit /etc/vfstab. The current list of ZFS mountpoints defined can be seen using zfs filelist:

# zfs list
NAME                 USED  AVAIL  REFER  MOUNTPOINT
boot                26.5G  40.5G   176K  /boot
boot/ROOT           7.46G  40.5G    18K  legacy
boot/ROOT/root      7.46G  40.5G  6.75G  /
boot/ROOT/root/var   727M  40.5G   727M  /var
boot/dump           2.00G  40.5G  2.00G  -
boot/export         15.0G  40.5G    20K  /export
boot/export/home    15.0G  40.5G  15.0G  /export/home
boot/swap              2G  42.5G    16K  -
storagepool         89.5K  66.9G     1K  /storagepool
# 

If you remember, from storagepool we will be creating /export/hosts. That is done as follows:

# zfs create storagepool/hosts
# df -h
Filesystem             size   used  avail capacity  Mounted on
boot/ROOT/root          67G   6.8G    40G    15%    /
/devices                 0K     0K     0K     0%    /devices
ctfs                     0K     0K     0K     0%    /system/contract
proc                     0K     0K     0K     0%    /proc
mnttab                   0K     0K     0K     0%    /etc/mnttab
swap                   1.9G   1.4M   1.9G     1%    /etc/svc/volatile
objfs                    0K     0K     0K     0%    /system/object
sharefs                  0K     0K     0K     0%    /etc/dfs/sharetab
fd                       0K     0K     0K     0%    /dev/fd
boot/ROOT/root/var      67G   727M    40G     2%    /var
swap                   1.9G    32K   1.9G     1%    /tmp
swap                   1.9G    40K   1.9G     1%    /var/run
boot                    67G   176K    40G     1%    /boot
boot/export             67G    20K    40G     1%    /export
boot/export/home        67G    15G    40G    28%    /export/home
storagepool             67G    19K    67G     1%    /storagepool
storagepool/hosts       67G    18K    67G     1%    /storagepool/hosts
#

If we just leave at that, a mount point, /storagepool/hosts, is created. But, we really do not want that. We want to mount storagepool/hosts in /export/hosts, and mount we shall.

# zfs set mountpoint=/export/hosts storagepool/hosts
# 

Now, it seems to be mounted where we want

# df -h
Filesystem             size   used  avail capacity  Mounted on
boot/ROOT/root          67G   6.8G    40G    15%    /
/devices                 0K     0K     0K     0%    /devices
ctfs                     0K     0K     0K     0%    /system/contract
proc                     0K     0K     0K     0%    /proc
mnttab                   0K     0K     0K     0%    /etc/mnttab
swap                   1.9G   1.4M   1.9G     1%    /etc/svc/volatile
objfs                    0K     0K     0K     0%    /system/object
sharefs                  0K     0K     0K     0%    /etc/dfs/sharetab
fd                       0K     0K     0K     0%    /dev/fd
boot/ROOT/root/var      67G   727M    40G     2%    /var
swap                   1.9G    32K   1.9G     1%    /tmp
swap                   1.9G    40K   1.9G     1%    /var/run
boot                    67G   176K    40G     1%    /boot
boot/export             67G    20K    40G     1%    /export
boot/export/home        67G    15G    40G    28%    /export/home
storagepool             67G    19K    67G     1%    /storagepool
storagepool/hosts       67G    18K    67G     1%    /export/hosts
#

Neat, huh? There is more we can do, like establish quotas and such stuff. But that will be for another episode.

Some parting thoughts

Remember that Sun call boot and storagepool pools. Even though we've only used one disk per pool, we could have used more. For instance, we could have grouped them together like in Linux LVM,

# zpool create  anotherpool c0t0d0 c0t1d0
# 

or, we could have made a pool where one of the disks mirrors the other, as in a raid 1

# zpool create  anotherpool mirror c0t0d0 c0t1d0
# 

Another option is instead of doing a mirror is to create a raid 5 (Sun claims it is a variation of raid 5, bigger, faster, better) using the raidz option and at least 3 drives (min for such raid),

# zpool create  anotherpool raidz c0t0d0 c0t1d0 c0t2d0
# 

We could also create hotspares for those arrays; check the man page for zpool for more info on that. I hope that will make you think on what ZFS can do and why I think it is rather neat.